Nicolette Fraillon was told she couldn’t be a conductor ‘because I was a woman’


Australian conductor Nicolette Fraillon says sexism is still an issue within the classical music scene.

Fraillon was the first woman in the world to conduct a ballet orchestra, and until December was the Australian Ballet’s chief conductor, a role she held for two decades.

Today, female conductors are still the exception.

“I think it’s improving, but … whilst we’re conscious of it and talking about it, we’re not where we need to be,” she told 7.30’s Laura Tingle.

“Anything that you can think of that’s been said about any woman in a leadership position, I have had said to me and said about me in the roles that I have played through my work.

“If you think of everything that any woman in a leadership position has said about the way you’re treated — think of Julia Gillard — where your hair is commented on, what you wear, how you look, if you are emotional in a performance. ‘See, it’s a woman. She’s emotional.’ 

“And I hadn’t thought about this when I wanted to be a conductor. I just wanted to be a conductor. I didn’t realise that having breasts would mean that would make that much more difficult in some way. 

“I just thought that’s what I wanted to be. I fell in love with conducting. It was one of those a-ha moments … I had that the first time I played in an orchestra, and the world came alive.”

Cate Blanchett plays a conductor in the film Tár.(Supplied: Focus Features)

Fraillon’s comments come amid controversy about the portrayal of a fictional female conductor in the new movie Tár, starring Cate Blanchett, who has already won plaudits — including an Oscar nomination — for her portrayal of a tyrannical, bullying conductor.

For many in the classical music sector, it has been troubling that the character is a woman, when there is a long history — almost a standard operating procedure in earlier decades — of such behaviour among the world’s leading male conductors.

Fraillon has not seen Tár, so didn’t want to comment on the film itself. But she said that she had “thought wistfully to myself why, for centuries, that was the case with very tyrannical male conductors who would exploit their power in terms of others”, and that it was sad it was a woman who was depicted.

“It is sad if there’s a movie finally about a female conductor, and we have had no recognition, and people haven’t thought about all the issues that face us, that the female in that movie is depicted in that way,” Fraillon said.

“I can understand, if that is the case, why there would be anger.”

‘It’s much better, but that’s not translating into more leadership positions’

Nicolette Fraillon says Australian audiences are now used to seeing female conductors.(Supplied)

Fraillon said she was initially told she was not allowed to study conducting “because I was a woman”.

She persevered, but once she was a conductor she had trouble finding someone who would hire her.

“I had people say to me, ‘I really like your work but I can’t employ you because you’re a woman.’

“That was confronting. Still is,” she said.

“When I started out in Europe, I was the only one. I was the first in every single theatre that I went into with every single orchestra.

“The reasons when I say, ‘Why can’t I do it?’ ‘Oh physically, you’re not up to it. Women can’t lead. Women can’t direct a large group of people.'”

These days, she says, female conductors are more accepted. 

“It is now more normal. Certainly in Australia, people are used to seeing female conductors,” she said.

“Players in the orchestra who might have found it difficult, confronting, challenging, largely in Australia have come to accept it.

“It’s much better, but that’s not translating into more leadership positions as chief conductors, artistic directors in this country and not across the world.”

Impact of COVID on the arts

Nicolette Fraillon with 7.30’s Laura Tingle.(ABC News: Tom Hancock)

Fraillon says she had been thinking for some time that 20 years was probably a good point at which to consider moving on from the Australian Ballet, but that COVID-19 had been particularly traumatic and exhausting.

“It was a very traumatic period for the world, but speaking on behalf of myself and my arts colleagues, I think there’s quite a lot of trauma that we haven’t actually yet had time to process because you’ve had to get on and do,” she told 7.30.

“But works that were postponed, cancelled, projects that people have worked towards for years — the number of people who lost work, jobs, have left the sector, because it just ended their capacity. They couldn’t pay bills, mortgages, support the family.

“I was in Melbourne at that time we were in all those endless lockdowns, concerned about dancers who, certainly in that first period of lockdown, physically were deteriorating, potentially to a point where they weren’t actually going to be able to recover and dance again; musicians who couldn’t practice because you’re either locked in with all the family at home and kids and homeschooling and everything else, but more importantly in an apartment building where if you practice, neighbours were also all locked in. That was really problematic.

“People who have worked for years and years and years and need to train every day, like sports people do, not able to practice for months on end, could be career-ending and was for many. 

“And all the works of art that didn’t happen, that the world didn’t see, that have gotten lost.”

Fraillon says COVID is still having an impact on the arts, with shows still having to be cancelled when too many people on stage or in the pit fell ill.

On the positive side, she says, COVID seems to have made many people appreciate the arts more.

“It did demonstrate, and particularly in places like Australia where politically perhaps, and even societally, we’re not as cognisant of the importance of the arts … and the difference that they make and what part in a civilised humane society the arts play … Everyone turned to music, classical music, in ways that they hadn’t; to music, to the arts, for solace, for emotional support,” she said.

Watch 7.30, Mondays to Thursdays 7.30pm on ABC iview and ABC TV

Lockdown, Authenticity Push Export Of Indian Classical Instruments


As ennui arising out of Covid-induced lockdown and restricted travel settled in over the last two years, people picked new hobbies like learning music or brushed up old ones, inadvertently pushing the exports of musical instruments upwards.

Under lockdown in foreign land and yearning for home, online shopping provided the Indian diaspora with an opportunity to lay their hands on authentic instruments like the sitar, tanpura, or tabla, which was a major reason behind the uptick in sales, said exporters and musicologists.

Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal had on October 26 tweeted that the exports have risen more than 3.5 times in the first six months of the current fiscal compared to the same period in 2013.

Retweeting Goyal’s tweet the same day, Prime Minister Narendra Modi said the growth was encouraging. ”With Indian music gaining popularity worldwide, there is a great opportunity to further grow in this sector,” he tweeted.

The increase, however, has been significant starting from 2019-20, when India recorded the export of musical instruments worth Rs 195.52 crore, according to the data from the Department of Commerce. Over the next two years of pandemic, the export shot up after a slight dip in 2020-21 with the sale of instruments worth Rs 187.14 crore.

The country in 2021-22 at the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic registered a sale of Rs 287.45 crore worth of musical instruments. “There has definitely been an increase in the export of Indian classical music instruments post-pandemic. I think as people were forced to stay inside, they started picking new hobbies, or wanted to revive an old one,” Ajay Rikhiram of Delhi-based Rikhi Ram Musical Instrument Mfg Co told PTI.

He added, while import of Western instruments like a guitar too increased, more Indian instruments such as sitar, tanpura, harmonium and tabla were exported. Its usage as an accompanying instrument makes tanpura an essential element for almost all classical music renditions, Rikhiram said.

Sitar, on the other hand, remains the most sought-after instrument for its dominance in Indian classical music and popularity due to artistes such as Pandit Ravi Shankar and The Beatles’ George Harrison, he said. According to the Rikhi Ram website, a sitar can cost anywhere between Rs 75,000 and Rs 3.5 lakh. Similarly, the price of a tanpura can also vary between Rs 25,000 to Rs 1.25 lakh.

He added that the sales mostly come from the US while European countries come next. Government data shows that the US was the biggest importer of musical instruments, parts, and accessories from India in 2021-22, giving a business worth USD 7.37 million, a little over Rs 60 crore.

This year, from April to August, the US imported equipment worth USD 3.42 million (Rs 28 crore approximately) from India. Germany has remained a close second for several years now. In 2021-22, Germany imported musical instruments, parts, and accessories worth USD 6.60 million, nearly Rs 54 crore, in 2021-22, it bought Indian instruments worth USD 2.52 million, nearly Rs 20 crore, from April till August this year.

Other major importers of Indian musical instruments are China, Malaysia, Indonesia, the UAE, France, Japan, and the UK. Ashish Dewani of Mumbai-based Haribhau Vishwanath Musical Industries said there has been an almost constant uptick in the export over the last two-three years. The reason, he believes, is the travel restrictions.

“Earlier people used to buy instruments on their trips to India, but since there were restrictions for the most part of the last two years they preferred buying them online. Online music classes also helped push the sale,” Dewani said.

But what is it about Indian-made instruments that makes them unique in their quality so much that people are prepared to pay exorbitant international shipping prices? Anupam Mahajan, former Head, and Dean, the Faculty of Music and Fine Arts at Delhi University, said it is the oral tradition of this craft that is handed down to the generations that is intrinsic to India.

“Nowhere in the world will you find karigar (artisans) who can make Indian instruments. Because it is an oral tradition and passed down to sons by their fathers and so on. It is a generational knowledge,” Mahajan told PTI. She added that the genuine craftsmen who make musical instruments have been in this profession for generations and each part of an instrument is crafted by a different artisan.

“The novelty of an Indian instrument lies in the fact that the type of wood that is used, the type of polishing and other materials can only be found in India. On top of that, the measurements are so intrinsically Indian that one would be hard-pressed to find a match elsewhere,” she said. Rikhiram explained that it would be nearly impossible to make a sitar that would have the same tone and texture as one made in India.

“The top reason is the availability of five seasons in India that treats the wood for four-five years like nowhere else possible. Next, the pumpkin gourd that is used in making the veena family of instruments, including sitar, is brought in from the coastal states where it is moulded in a specific type of mud that makes it suitable for a sitar,” he said. It is the small things like these that make Indian classical music instruments unique in nature and also sought by enthusiasts the world over, he added.

(With PTI inputs)



Source link