A giant of popular music


Bacharach performs with the BBC orchestra in 2008 (PA)

Burt Bacharach was one of the most distinguished and successful composers of the last century.

Working most fruitfully with the lyricist Hal David, his addictively intelligent songs embodied unconventional time signatures, shifting chords and a fusion of pop and rock, jazz, and Latin elements. With Bacharach’s adventurous song structures married to David’s words, often bittersweet lyrics as though from a cinematic school of realism, the duo were like the personification of New York’s Brill Building hit factory.

Although not all these songs were with David, Bacharach, who has died aged 94, enjoyed more than 50 UK Top 40 hits, and more than 70 in his native US. A remarkable 38 of these tunes were with the classically trained former gospel singer Dionne Warwick with whom the pair began working in 1962. Several of Bacharach’s compositions were bigger hits in the UK than in America.

The pair first hit the charts in 1957 with “The Story of My Life”, a US No 15 hit for Marty Robbins; covered in the UK by Michael Holliday, the song hit the top of the charts. By the end of that year, they had a further UK No 1, with Perry Como’s “Magic Moments”, entering the top five in the US.

With his silky movie-star good looks and string of beautiful wives, Bacharach seemed almost a Playboy-magazine image of an apparently sophisticated 1960s Manhattan male.

He and Hal David stood at the heart of the cultural paradox of white Jewish men providing hits for several of the era’s top black R’n’B acts. But sometimes they drifted apart: during a lean three-year spell from 1958 to 1961 Bacharach toured Europe and America as musical director for Marlene Dietrich. Whilst with Dietrich, Bacharach became a believer in astrology: Dietrich consulted her astrologer who told her not to fly on a plane that was then forced to make a crash landing.

Working briefly with lyricist Bob Hilliard, Bacharach scored in 1960 for The Drifters with “Please Stay” and Gene McDaniels with “Tower of Strength” (a UK no 1 for Frankie Vaughan); the next year, with Mack David and Luther Dixon, he charted The Shirelles’ “Baby It’s You” – covered by The Beatles on their first album.

Reunited with David later in 1961, Gene Pitney’s “The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance”, inspired by the John Ford western, was a US No 4. Over the next two years, they gave Pitney further hits: “True Love Never Runs Smooth” and their first classic, “24 Hours From Tulsa”, David’s lyrics offering almost a film script in themselves.

Following Dionne Warwick’s first hit, in 1962 with “Don’t Make Me Over”, the pair’s next three tunes for her flopped. But the next year’s “Anyone Who Had a Heart” established her as a chart staple. No 8 in the US, it was a UK chart-topper for Cilla Black. Dionne Warwick’s next record “Walk On By” was an even larger US hit.

On ‘The Burt Bacharach Show’ in 1972 (ITV/Shutterstock)

An only child, Bacharach had grown up in a world in which a certain celebrity in the family was taken for granted. Starting off as a men’s fashion buyer for department stores in Kansas City, Newark and New York City, his father Bert Bacharach transferred this skill into becoming men’s fashion editor for Collier’s and Pic magazines; from 1960 until 1978 he wrote “Now See Here”, a nationally syndicated newspaper column; and he was author of a number of books, including Bert Bacharach’s Book For Men and Right Dress: Success Through Better Grooming – clear clues to his son’s suave appearance.

Given classical piano lessons as a child and teenager, Bacharach soon discovered a love of jazz. Especially taken with bebop artists like Dizzy Gillespie and Charlie Parker, he would sneak into Manhattan clubs whilst underage to watch them. “When I was 15,” he said, “some of the guys at school and I formed a band. Ten pieces, with myself at the piano. We played at parties and at the local dances.”

(Alamy)

Studying at multiple universities, Bacharach studied music, including jazz harmony, an important ingredient of his songs. Of all his teachers, he later said, the violinist and composer Darius Milhaud was most significant; a French Jewish émigré to the US, Milhaud had been appreciably influenced by Brazilian music and by jazz he had heard in Harlem in 1922. “Before I went into the service during the Korean War I studied with Milhaud at the Music Academy of the West which was a summer programme,” Bacharach wrote in his 2013 autobiography. “I wrote a ‘Sonatina for Violin, Oboe and Piano’.”

Having hung out with the likes of John Cage in New York, Bacharach was concerned this piece for Milhaud was “too melodic”. “Don’t be afraid of writing something people can remember and whistle. Never be afraid to be melodic,” Milhaud disabused Bacharach’s purist anxiety.

After his national service spell in the army, Bacharach became a professional pianist. “After my army discharge, I played piano in night clubs, including Nino’s Continental, on Fifty-third Street, and the Bayview, on Fire Island.” This led to him becoming an accompanist for such highly successful singers as Vic Damone (whom he had met as a dance-band arranger with the US army in Germany), Steve Lawrence, the Ames Brothers and Paula Stewart; in 1953 he married Paula Stewart, remaining with her for the next 13 years.

Performing in Hollywood in 2005 (Getty)

“I started writing my own orchestrations as a kind of self defense,” he said. “No matter how good the words or the melody of a song, it has got to be showcased properly. And then, you can write a great song, but you need a successful record if you’re going to have a hit. You need that certain magic to happen at a recording session. Much of the feeling of a record – my records – comes from the rhythm section.”

In 1966 Bacharach married actress Angie Dickinson: they were together until 1980. Dickinson was a portal for him into the world of movie scores. That year he wrote the title song for “Alfie”, a No 1 UK hit for Cilla Black and a lesser US success for Dionne Warwick, and the score for “What’s New, Pussycat”, Tom Jones enjoying a Top 5 hit with the title tune. For 1969’s Butch Cassidy and the Sundance Kid he earned an Oscar and a Grammy for Best Score, as well as a number one hit for B J Thomas for “Raindrops Keep Falling on my Head”.

With Hal David he worked with playwright Neil Simon in 1968 on a musical based on Billy Wilder’s 1960 film The Apartment. Promises, Promises, the result, ran for three years on Broadway, another Grammy winner.

(Getty)

Also in 1966, Bacharach had himself stepped into the recording studio. Hit Maker! Bacharach Plays the Bacharach Hits presented largely instrumental rerecordings of his best-known songs and was a UK hit. Over the next 13 years, he released five more album collections of his own hit songs. The last of these, 1979’s “Woman”, was an ambitious song cycle recorded live in the studio with the Houston Philharmonic Orchestra.

During the early 1970s, the Bacharach and David songwriting partnership ended. Their musical version of the Frank Capra movie Lost Horizon led to a knot of lawsuits, with each suing the other, and Warwick suing both of them for failing to provide her with new material. Bacharach worked with other lyricists, but it was not until 1981 that he returned to the top of the charts with “Arthur’s Theme (The Best That You Can Do)” by Christopher Cross. The song was taken from the film Arthur, which Bacharach also scored. It brought him a third Oscar; also it united him with lyricist Carol Bayer Sager – he married her the next year, and they adopted a son, Christopher, in 1986.

The composer with Marlene Dietrich (left) in 1964 (Getty)

Professionally the pair were also strong together: as well as Sager’s own “Stronger Than Before”, there were other hits: Roberta Flack’s “Making Love”, Dionne Warwick’s “That’s What Friends Are For” as well as Warwick with Jeffrey Osborne’s “Love Power”, and Patty Labelle and Michael McDonald’s “On My Own”.

In 1991, however, Bacharach and Sager divorced. Two years later, he married Jane Hansen, a ski instructor 32 years his junior with whom he had two sons.

In the mid-1990s “easy listening”, a supposedly kitsch form into which Bacharach’s music had been logged since the underground album movement of the late 1960s, was turned on its head. No longer considered a guilty pleasure, it became recognised as a valid art form, a feature of chill-out rooms at raves. Oasis’s Noel Gallagher, the era’s biggest group, spoke reverently of Bacharach’s work, joining him onstage at London’s Royal Festival Hall on “This Guy’s In Love With You”; and there were similar tributes from REM, White Stripes, John Zorn and others. There was even a Bacharach cameo role in Mike Myers’ 1997 film Austin Powers: International Man of Mystery.

Two years before Bacharach had joined up with Elvis Costello to write the song “God Give Me Strength for Grace of my Heart”. It was included on 1998’s Painted From Memory, an album containing a further 11 Bacharach-Costello songs, with equal cover credits. The pair undertook a small tour and in 1999 won a Grammy for the album’s “I Still Have That Other Girl”. The previous year the duo had collaborated on “I’ll Never Fall in Love Again” and made a joint cameo appearance in the Austin Powers sequel The Spy Who Shagged Me.

Bacharach’s star once again was in the ascendancy. There were tribute concerts to him in London and New York.

In 2007, however, tragedy struck him: his daughter Nikki, born to his marriage with Angie Dickinson and suffering from Asperger’s syndrome, took her own life.

Recovered, Bacharach continued to tour globally, though on a smaller scale. In 2013, at the age of 85, he set out on the You Gotta Be Kidding Tour – so called “because that is the only possible response to doing 13 concerts at this time of my life”.

He continued to tour past his 90th birthday, performing to crowds in the US, UK and Europe in 2018 and 2019.

Burt Freeman Bacharach, composer, born 12 May 1928, died 8 February 2023

Introducing Maiden Seoul as they release debut single, “Verve” – Aipate


Maiden Seoul introduced themselves a few days ago with their debut single, “Verve”.

The trio consists of vocalist and keyboardist Soo Jin Yi, eclectic guitarist Ian Macaulay and drummer Rashid Williams. Maiden Seoul’s sound is a masterful amalgam of styles: indie-electro pop with jazz influences.

They will be showcasing it in their debut album, Cinematic. While song “Verve” offers us a taste of what to come, it’s in itself a magnificent song.

“Verve” is soulful and lyrical. Listen to the track and follow Maiden Seoul on Instagram.



BRIT awards: Harry Styles triumphs with most wins


LONDON, Feb 11 (Reuters) – Harry Styles was the big winner at the BRIT awards, Britain’s pop music honours, on Saturday, winning all four categories he had been nominated in, a week after his triumph at the Grammys.

Styles took home the coveted album of the year for “Harry’s House”, song of the year for his synth pop hit “As It Was”, best pop/R&B act and artist of the year, one of two gender-neutral categories introduced last year after BRIT awards organisers got rid of female and male distinctions.

The contenders for that prize were all men, which had irked many in the industry and on social media.

“I’m really, really grateful for this and I’m very aware of my privilege up here tonight,” Styles said in his acceptance speech, dedicating the artist of the year award to a list of female singers.

Styles, who rose to fame on talent show “The X Factor” as a member of boy band One Direction, last week won two Grammy awards, including album of the year.

Latest Updates

View 2 more stories

“This night has been really special to me … Thank you so much for the welcome home,” Styles said on Saturday after his final win, for best album.

“I’m so, so proud to be a British artist out there in the world. I’m so proud to be here tonight celebrating British artists and British music.”

A statement on the BRIT Awards’ website said the gender-neutral categories had been introduced so artists were judged “solely on the quality and popularity of their work, rather than on who they are, or how they choose to identify.”

But it added that organisers “acknowledge and share in the disappointment” of no women making the list. “A key factor is that, unfortunately, there were relatively few commercially successful releases by women in 2022 compared to those by men.”

“Of the 71 eligible artists on the longlist, only 12 (17%) are women. We recognise this points to wider issues around the representation of women in music that must also be addressed.”

Singer Rina Sawayama welcomed the change to gender-neutral categories but said the list of nominees should be longer.

“If you have more nominees then you’re going to see a cross section of what has happened throughout the year and who has made an impact,” she told Reuters on the red carpet.

Indie rockers Wet Leg won group of the year and best new artist. Music star Beyonce was named international artist of the year and her hit “Break My Soul” won international song of the year.

For a factbox of winners, click read more

Reporting by Marie-Louise Gumuchian in London; Additional reporting by Hanna Rantala in London; Editing by Ben Dangerfield, Matthew Lewis and Daniel Wallis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Sonica unveiled their ethereally experimental shoegaze revival, Wait for Me – Independent Music – New Music


With one of the most experimental revivalist approaches to Shoegaze known to the airwaves, the Perth-based outfit, Sonica, easily set their lush reverb-swathed tones apart from the rest. Intent on not being another Lush, Ride, or Curve replica act, Sonica found innovative ways of distorting their dream pop melodies without bursting the semi-lucid bubble

The bleeding vocals from Claire Turton stand up to the mesmeric plate, containing the same ethereal beguile as Cocteau Twins and Siouxsie and the Banshees in the moody standout single, Wait for Me, which pushes grungy tones into the midst of the euphonic kaleidoscopic accordance. Leaving ample space for the gritty and cold timbre of 80s post-punk, the four-piece revisited the golden era of shoegaze by taking a route never tread before.

Wait for Me is now available to stream on Spotify.

Review by Amelia Vandergast



Mirrors of Zlín Installation / Loom on the Moon


Mirrors of Zlín Installation / Loom on the Moon

+ 28

© BoysPlayNice

Text description provided by the architects. The Exhibition The Mirrors of Zlín was created for the occasion of 700 years of history of the city of Zlín, which manifested as a series of multimedia installations in the chateau park. The first of the three installations work with the distinctive perspective of writer Pavel Kosatík on the evolution of the city and its surroundings, which we subsequently complemented and summarised with illustrations.

© BoysPlayNice

This resulted in an intergenerational dialogue between text and image, which are sometimes in harmony and sometimes in contrast. In addition to this narrative part, there are two installations in the chateau park. One is an immersive film, an audiovisual experience that allows visitors to inhabit past moments of Zlín in various eras, seasons, lights, in rural times, during a fire, when the railway arrived, during the Bata boom, and also present moments. It is a frame-by-frame painted animation that treats each frame of the film as a painting.

© BoysPlayNice
© BoysPlayNice

The last permanent installation is the mirrors of Zlín – a lyrical constellation of fluid shapes, poetically placed among the most beautiful trees of Zlín‘s park, whose treetops, flowing sky, and curious passing visitors they reflect. The soul of this part of the installation is a sound composition that is a celebration of the cycle of time, the turning of the seasons, the lengthening and shortening of the days, the moments of equinox and solstice, which functions as an unpredictable, surprising solar calendar or astrological clock.

Plan – Site

The basis for the music composition that sounds through the park in various phases of the year was a careful mapping and study of the sounds of bells in the belfries of the Zlín Region. Thus the park rings with the vibrations of bell bronze, which creates a scaled-down geographical imprint of the Zlín Region. The individual multi-channel musical compositions and their exact position in time and the year correspond to a study of the movement of the sun and stars. The sound level is supported with a moving light, which not only provides a visual accompaniment to the mirrors and music but also a poetic and playful alternative to the park‘s night-time lighting.

© BoysPlayNice

This results in a harmony between natural and artificial light, between the sound of the park, the musical composition, and the passage of time. The Mirrors of Zlín thus becomes an artwork that can exist only in this place, at this time. Materials. The exhibition is composed of three interconnected elements:

© BoysPlayNice

1. Encyclopedia: The Encyclopaedia is a simple wooden wall with a circular ground plan with a total length of about 40 m and a height of 3 m. Its shape adapts to the existing trees – it gives way to the eaves line of their crowns, giving the wall a dynamic form. The outer shell is made of a mirror-polished steel sheet, and the inner surface of waterproof plywood serves as a surface for the artistic representation of 700 years of Zlín’s history.

© BoysPlayNice
© BoysPlayNice
© BoysPlayNice

2. Immerse: The section called Immerse is essentially a simple summer cinema. The projection surface is similar in design to the Encyclopedia – the waterproof plywood skeleton is lined on both sides with plywood panels, and the inner side facing the Encyclopedia is mirrored polished steel sheet. This creates an interesting optical theatre for the audience between the two mirrored surfaces – one flat and the other rounded.

© BoysPlayNice
© BoysPlayNice

3. Statements: The last element of the exhibition consists of a group of mirrors placed on the lawn between the trees, evoking rain puddles. Even their construction is designed to be lightweight, and non-invasive. The base is designed on earth screws that anchor the Statements against being moved and toppled over. A simple thermal and moisture-insulated enclosure for the equipment will be placed above the ground surface. The “level” itself is designed as a thin plate with a polished stainless steel sheet surface. The individual elements are varied in shape and size – like real rain puddles. Inside each element, there is a speaker and lighting technology. The elements are interconnected and synchronized into an immersive installation.

© BoysPlayNice



Did The Black Eyed Peas Really Sell Out, Using Fergie To Break Into Pop Music?


While The Black Eyed Peas is an icon in the music industry now, it wasn’t always like that. When Fergie joined the group in 2002, its popularity skyrocketed. The Black Eyed Peas was on everybody’s lips in the 2000s with popular songs like Where Is The Love?, I Gotta Feeling, and My Humps. Due to a significant increase in popularity over the years, it seemed that Fergie was there to stay.

From hip-hop, The Black Eyed Peas transitioned to pop music. This move meant gaining more international fame. However, Fergie quietly left The Black Eyed Peas in 2017 before the band’s seventh album was released. Due to this move, fans were not that impressed with the album.

Fergie Catapulted The Black Eyed Peas Into Pop Music






© Provided by TheThings
Fergie looking shocked during What’s Up TV interview

Like many other bands, fans have their favorites. The Black Eyed Peas was successful even before Fergie joined them. However, when she became their lead singer, The Black Eyed Peas became one of the best-selling bands ever.

As a result of the group’s success, will.i.am is worth around $70 million.

The album ‘Elephunk’ released in 2003 immediately transformed The Black Eyed Peas from a successful band to being famous internationally. Since Fergie just joined the group before this album was released, she surely contributed significantly to the album’s success.

Yet the Black Eyed Peas formed like many other bands. Two friends, in this case, will.i.am (William Adams) and apl.de.ap (Allan Pineda Lindo) wanted to take the world by surprise with their music and dance moves.

They experimented with hip-hop and rap in the 90s, but that period is not the one that boosted their careers. When Kim Hill joined the group in 1998 as its vocalist, The Black Eyed Peas was still not as successful as it is today.

After two years, Kim Hill eventually made the decision to step down in 2000.

RELATED: Everything We Know About Fergie’s Son, Axl Jack Duhamel

The Black Eyed Peas was not internationally famous until Fergie joined the group in 2002. Her appearance, attitude, and remarkable vocals finally gave a boost to The Black Eyed Peas’ popularity.

Shortly after Fergie joined and also due to the transition to pop music, the group accomplished high record sales.

Fergie Left The Black Eyed Peas To Focus On Motherhood

When news of Fergie leaving the band was released, no one understood why. As fans became more upset with the decision, they wanted to know the real reason why she left after 15 years.

During an interview, will.i.am explained that Fergie left The Black Eyed Peas to focus on being a mom to her son, Axl.

Born in 2013, Axl was around 5 years old when his mother left The Black Eyed Peas.

Even if the time of diapers and first steps was long gone, Fergie’s busy schedule as a lead singer in the group meant that she didn’t have the time to be fully focused on each step of being a mom.

RELATED: Is Fergie Still Making Music? Everything She’s Been Up To Since Leaving The Black Eyed Peas

Leaving The Black Eyed Peas gave her more time with her son, as well as more time to work on independent projects. Fergie has certainly been busy over the years with making new music, fashion, and receiving awards.

Also, she focused on building her wine brand, Ferguson Crest, located in Santa Ynez Valley, California.

The Black Eyed Peas Replaced Fergie Shortly After She Left

A few years after Fergie said goodbye to being their lead singer, The Black Eyed Peas members filled her spot with J Rey Soul. As a finalist in ‘The Voice Philippines’ in 2013, Jessica Reynoso (J Rey Soul) was part of the Team apl.de.ap.

The Black Eyed Peas noticed her during that time.

She officially became the lead singer when she contributed to the album ‘Translation’. While Fergie was quick to promote the band’s new album on her Instagram, many fans were not impressed with this recent change.

As someone new was seen performing the original Fergie parts, fans quickly went to Twitter to express their disapproval of J Rey Soul’s performance.

Fergie Remained Friends With The Black Eyed Peas Members

After spending about 15 years working, and being successful together, Fergie and The Black Eyed Peas couldn’t have lost contact.

Fergie left the band amicably for personal purposes, not because of an internal conflict between the members. She just needed more time to focus on motherhood.






© Provided by TheThings
Fergie and The Black Eyed Peas on the stage

During an interview, will.i.am created confusion when he was asked why Fergie left the group. He quickly answered that he didn’t know the reasons. At that moment, Fergie was reportedly not part of The Black Eyed Peas WhatsApp group.

As time has passed and fans have become more interested in the subject, there was a need for an official statement. This came in 2020 when Fergie mentioned that they all “try to keep in touch”, especially for important dates in their lives.

RELATED: What Really Ended Fergie And Josh Duhamel’s 13-Year Marriage

However, Fergie leaving The Black Eyed Peas mattered more to their fans rather than to them. Both Fergie and The Black Eyed Peas continue to have successful projects. While the band releases music every few months, Fergie is successful on her own.

Still, each contributed to the fame of the other. Fergie’s career received a boost when joining The Black Eyed Peas, while the band successfully integrated its name into the pop music industry.

Kash Doll Teams With DJ Drama For ‘Back on Dexter: A Gangsta Grillz Mixtape’


Perhaps inspired by her role on the hit Starz series BMF, Kash Doll connects with DJ Drama for her Gangsta Grillz mixtape Back on Dexter.

An 11-track offering, the project exclusively features Midwest-reared musicians, with many of them from Detroit: Icewear Vezzo, Babyface Ray, Sada Baby, Tay B, Coach Joey, RMC Mike, Peezy, Bryan Hamilton, TLG Deuce, Louie Ray, YN Jay, Payroll Giovanni, and Lakeyah. The project serves as a precursor to Kash Doll’s forthcoming sophomore album, due later in 2023.

Stream Back on Dexter: A Gangsta Grillz Mixtape below.

Kash Doll Teams With DJ Drama For ‘Back on Dexter: A Gangsta Grillz Mixtape’ was last modified: February 10th, 2023 by Meka



Harini Rini Raghavan: My music is a medium for me to share my culture with others | Tamil Movie News


Chennai-born, New York-based singer-violinist Harini Rini Raghavan has been wowing audiences with her version of Indian electronica even as she rubs shoulders with the best musical talents at the Berklee College of Music. Rini is now all set to showcase her musical abilities across India as she gets ready for her Rini Live/India tour. The musician shares with us her experience of being an ambassador of Indian music in the Western world…
Excited about your India tour?
Very much! It’s been almost five years since our last tour, and we’ve had a lot of new music and fans since then. We can’t wait to meet everyone and connect with them.

Have you visited Chennai before? Any fave spots?
Yes, my hometown is Chennai, and I’m here quite often. My band’s drummer visited Chennai on their last tour, but the other members are newer; it’s their first time in Chennai. A favourite destination would be Besant Nagar Beach and Eden Restaurant.
When and how did your fusion music act start?
I created this project when I graduated from Berklee in 2015. I wanted to always create a project with people bringing in their own styles in an aesthetic way. I met so many amazing foreigners who were interested in playing Indian music or contemporary Indian music. So, it felt natural to seek them out, create a composition that’s Indian (classical/folk) at its core, and then have enough space for them to explore their own styles within this framework. I also feel that over the years this has become a medium for me to share my culture with people from other cultures. When we are on tours, we talk about our food, our upbringing, and our culture.

How is it to work with an international lineup of musicians to get your desired sound?
My education at Berklee helped me learn to communicate with international musicians through sheet music and see Indian music through the grammar of Western music. This made it very easy to chart out my compositions and then explain to the band how I envisioned the song. A sheet of music and a MIDI demo are what I start with to get across the song form and the nuances of the ragas of the composition. I think without this, it can be a cumbersome process to work together with musicians from different musical idioms.

Can you share the experience of being part of the voting process for the Grammys?
Being a voting member really makes me feel like I have the power to be a part of recognising and honouring music made by artists from around the world. I feel like I bring representation to the Recording Academy with my identity and the music I play, making it a more diverse space. I really enjoyed listening to all the submissions in my favourite categories.

How is Indian music received in the West? Do you think Indian acts can crack the code of international stardom like BTS?

It’s amazing! So many Indian and Indian American musicians are doing great work presenting both Indian classical and contemporary music to western audiences — bands like NY-based Red Baraat, and Brooklyn Raga Massive have built up a huge community of non-Indian people who appreciate Indian music. Indian acts can definitely get audiences on the international stage. For fame, though, I think it’s different. The music needs to be more pop (like BTS), and I think some film songs (the equivalent of Western pop) have had that reach on social platforms, like Kolaveri or Naattu Naattu.

You’ve toured many places and collaborated with many fine artists. What is next?
Shakthisree Gopalan and I just presented a show in NYC that was a combination of indie fusion, Tamil and Malayalam songs. We plan to take that on the road soon. I hope to play in Canada later in the year and do a bunch of other cities in the US with my band. Record some new Blue Carpet sessions with international artistes.

Architecture Before Speech organizes the work of 112 practices


An interior spread of the table of contents from Inscriptions: Architecture Before Speech, designed by Studio Lin (Courtesy Harvard GSD/Harvard University Press)

Inscriptions: Architecture Before Speech
Edited by K. Michael Hays and Andrew Holder | Harvard University Graduate School of Design, Harvard University Press | $60

Inscriptions: Architecture Before Speech is a 624-page doorstopper reminiscent of the shelf-busting tomes published in the anni mirabiles of the late 1990s. It is filled with excellent work, much of it exhibited in a show staged at the Harvard Graduate School of Design’s Druker Gallery in 2018, also called Inscriptions. Both efforts attempt to extract a theory of contemporary architecture from a constellation of 112 practices—some young, others more well-known—that fill faculty rosters in architectural schools throughout the world. Many of the designers and practices come from the GSD’s ranks or have studied there. However, Inscriptions does not feel burdened by a sense of disproportionate representation. In looking at the 750 images chosen by K. Michael Hays and Andrew Holder for Inscriptions, what emerges is a snapshot of a moment in contemporary practice invested (as usual) in forms, materials, and tectonics. This is no surprise, of course, and even an architecturally interested reader with no prior knowledge of the book or appetite for its heady arguments will recognize the work by the featured practices. Viewers will likely appreciate seeing these projects in a single bound volume, fully outside the more familiar formats of social media. Gathered together, there is a hint of cohesiveness—a flash of understanding that, yes, these folks are all up to something interesting.

(Courtesy Harvard GSD/Harvard University Press)

Blink, however, and you may miss the occasional nods to urbanism, landscape, or infrastructure. The same goes for the handful of moments that address current events (primarily in essay contributions by Lucia Allais and Sylvia Lavin). History, or rather its imperfect, formalist eidolon—breathed into life by Rudolf Wittkower and Colin Rowe and kept alive today by Hays—remains at the forefront in Inscriptions. Hays and Holder argue for a persistence of forms (“Originals”) that predate texts and thereby inscribe themselves in architectural culture. Readers may find it strange that a term that refers to the act of writing is used to refer to something that existed before speech. Yet in his introductory “Prelude,” Holder disposes of this conundrum rather quickly. He is clear in his insistence that “Inscription” is not about writing, but about creating a media-friendly array of objects with banal titles like “slack collections,” “scatters,” and “stacks.” “Architects pitch design against—or rather inscribe it onto—the emptiness of what we would call an original […] such that the original persists as a regulating substrate even while it is overwritten by the architectural activity reforming its surface,” Holder continues, in a passage reminiscent of Franz Kafka’s “In the Penal Colony.” In that story, a visitor travels to a prison to get a firsthand glimpse of the “Harrow,” a machine that inscribes and re inscribes a sentence for a crime on a prisoner’s flesh.

(Courtesy Harvard GSD/Harvard University Press)

I also thought of Fredric Jameson’s 1975 book, The Prison-House of Language. As a reviewer, I feel sheepish about conjuring Jameson, yet his presence lurks within the heady conceptualizing in Inscriptions. The Prison-House of Language is especially relevant: In it, Jameson remarked how “philosophic language feels its way gropingly along the walls of its own conceptual prison, describing it from the inside as though it were only one of the possible worlds of which the others are nonetheless inconceivable.” Something similar is happening in Inscriptions, and it becomes especially evident when noticing the book’s design. In each of the chapters dedicated to an inscription, project images are printed as monochrome plates, a design decision that leaves them bereft of any vitality. (Color arrives on the glossy signatures, reserved for the table of contents and interludes.) Within the pages of Inscriptions, the field of contemporary architecture is flattened, whether due to Studio Lin’s now-familiar brand of monograph normcore, or conformed to Hays and Holder’s curatorial vision pinned to the page.

Reading through Inscriptions is like listening to a piece of ambient music or binge-watching a streaming show. It is like the steady blur of white noise, a kind of background that does not necessarily serve as a setting but is just there. Relentlessly so. And after a while all your eyes may recognize are fields of square black-and-white images interspersed among lengthy essays typeset in a vertically elongated sans serif typeface that seems to be made to be read quickly from top to bottom in a PDF format on a computer screen. The book captures today’s doomscroll aesthetic.

(Courtesy Harvard GSD/Harvard University Press)

The debt to semiotic theory is clear enough that the diagram that organizes the book’s content comes from A. J. Greimas’s “semiotic square.” The square bears a passing resemblance to the Klein diagram made famous in Rosalind Krauss’s “Sculpture in the Expanded Field,” and yet it is supposed to operate more like a blank terrain, or even something like the “Approval Matrix” in New York Magazine. It is, in other words, a flat space, an idealized frame for idealized relations. It also puts readers in the unlikely position of having to make sense of the book on their own. It is all well to ask the reader to make conjectures and find patterns. However, when your only guide is a talismanic diagram that itself becomes an empty signifier, things can get a bit taxing. (It evokes Laurie Anderson’s quip from her song “Sharkey’s Night”: “Hey sport. You connect the dots. You pick up the pieces.”) Or, to use a term from astronomy, it is asterism: finding, in a vast field of objects and stars, connections and patterns that otherwise did not exist.

(Courtesy Harvard GSD/Harvard University Press)

Throughout Inscriptions, the editors and contributors refer to Hays and Holder’s curatorial vision. What this vision is, however, remains a mystery, as it is alluded to in the most generic terms. “Curation,” Holder declares in the prelude, “is perhaps the ideal test bed for this ambition to align discourse with architecture’s artifacts.” And when it comes to the tricky issue of writing an exhibition catalogue, Holder admits that the book is not so much a tabula rasa as an opportunity to revisit and reimagine the meaning of “inscription” and its relation to architectural culture. And yet the contributing essays seem to operate as if the book were a more traditional exhibition catalogue. Stan Allen, for instance, observes that “Inscriptions maps […] the dilemma of the exhibition curator when practice itself has become a form of curation. For many younger architects, including some represented in this publication, design is reconceived as an operation of selecting, sorting, and editing.” These are largely generic statements about curation, the equivalent of telling readers, “Our curatorial strategy is that we have a curatorial strategy.” And if the intent is to portray design as curation, this too is unfortunate, because it reveals an all-too-overbearing curatorial strategy that focuses on similarity rather than originality.

There is a lot that is good in Inscriptions. The design work is generally excellent, and the reader is rewarded at the end of the book with a portfolio of projects with full descriptions and better images that do more work in describing the book’s ambitions. The essays too are often illuminating: Texts by Antoine Picon, Edward Eigen, Marrikka Trotter, and Lavin set a historiographic armature for Hays and Holder’s disciplinary ambitions. The temptation to mention Lavin’s essay in the same breath as Lucia Allais’s is because both are exceptional works that stand out in their analysis of the history and theory of screen culture in architectural education. Phillip Denny’s study of “the creaturely” is a bit puzzling only because his reliance on literary critic Sianne Ngai’s theory of the aesthetic category of “cute” is rendered into a purely visual category without acknowledging the importance of “larger social arrangements,” in Ngai’s words. The book ends with an intense postlude by K. Michael Hays that reconfigures semiotic theory with the goal of “allowing us to pass from identity politics to a political economy of the Thing” in a “theoretically infinite series of possible encounters.”

(Courtesy Harvard GSD/Harvard University Press)

Inscription’s contents will no doubt be pored over in studios and seminars in the years to come. But any intellectual gains will be hard-won, as the opacity of the framework threatens to obscure the work of the 112 practices whose images are lodged within.

Enrique Ramirez is a writer and historian of art and architecture. He teaches at the University of Michigan’s Taubman College of Architecture and Urban Planning.

What readers and writers can learn from the techniques of classical and jazz pianists


In a typical jazz composition, the left hand strikes chords to create harmony and rhythm while the right hand picks out the melody. Using this as a metaphor, in fiction, the right hand would take care of the characters and plot while the left creates a thickening weave of allusion and counterpoint.

In a recent NPR Fresh Air interview with Brad Mehldau, the acclaimed jazz pianist mentions that early on in his career, he decided to spend more time with classical music in order to further develop his left hand.

With a typical jazz composition, the left hand strikes chords to create harmony and rhythm, while the right hand picks out the melody. Mehldau, however, concentrated on mastering some works by composers such as Bach, Brahms, and Beethoven which called for more complicated left-hand movements.

He went on to incorporate this style into his jazz playing, in the manner of others before him such as Oscar Peterson and Art Tatum. The results are striking. In Mehldau’s interpretation of Thelonious Monk’s ‘Monk’s Dream’, for example, the interviewer notes that “it sounds like you’re really doing independent things with your right hand and your left hand…there’s just these waves of sound, but you still hear the melody, like, woven through”.

The Victorian aesthete Walter Pater once remarked that all art aspires to the condition of music. That has been interpreted in various ways, to do with abstraction and uniting form and content. On another note, turning the function of a pianist’s left and right hands into a metaphor for creating as well as reading fiction offers interesting possibilities.

The right hand, in this case, would be the development of the main characters and plot that carries them from the first page to the last. For many novels, this is the dominant melody at the expense of other elements. These are the books often described as unputdownable, with eventful twists and turns leading to a satisfactory resolution. No mean feat.

Other novels use both right and left hands to advantage. The result is a rich and complex work with greater resonance than the rest. The right hand takes care of the characters and plot, while the left hand creates a thickening weave of allusion and counterpoint.

A strong sense of place is among such left-hand elements of novels. As Eudora Welty put it in one of her essays, place is “one of the lesser angels that watch over the racing hand of fiction”. Location, she emphasised, is “the ground conductor of all the currents of emotion, belief and moral conviction that charge out from the story in its course”.

Of course, all novels set their action in one location or another, real or imaginary. The point is that in some of them, the characteristics of a place are dominant and inform the whole work. The obvious examples are William Faulkner’s Yoknapatawpha County and R.K. Narayan’s Malgudi, but there are several more, from the creaking, shadowy interiors of supernatural fiction to English country houses where butlers roam.

The left hand has to do a lot more work in historical fiction and SF. Worlds have to be created, contexts need to be established, and settings should be out of the ordinary, yet adhere to an internal logic.

Subplots and minor characters across genres are also left-hand elements. They can emphasise certain aspects, serve as a foil to others, and provide an ironic commentary on the book’s themes. It makes sense not to let these overshadow a novel’s main developments, though even that can be enjoyable if done with gusto. Charles Dickens, for one, didn’t hold back in Oliver Twist, Bleak House, and many others.

To continue with the musical analogies, a novelist’s style can be said to be the keynote of the work. From this distinctive chord, other progressions take place. Both left and right hand work together to create a fundamental consonance: look at Rushdie’s chutnification, Austen’s irony, or Nabokov’s allusions and alliterations, for instance.

In these and other ways, a book becomes a full-bodied symphony, more resonant than simply another tale well told. As James Baldwin puts it in Sonny’s Blues: “…a piano is just a piano. It’s made out of so much wood and wires and little hammers and big ones, and ivory. While there’s only so much you can do with it, the only way to find this out is to try; to try and make it do everything.”